Competency Framework ── 8 Dimensions × Two Axes × L1–L4

The reviewer's competence, divided into eight dimensions (detect, push back, embed), each recast through a scope×abstraction quadrant and an L1–L4 scale. A high-resolution framework that separates scale, level, and divergence, treating the diagonal as the true path of growth. Ten parts.

Introduction — Get the Map First

Grab the whole picture before the episodes.

The Essential Question ── Who Detects, Pushes Back, and Embeds the Gap

Calling material review "hunting for banned words" gets it only half right.

Seeing People on Two Axes ── Quadrant, and Scale/Level/Divergence

Measure ability on a single line and two people of completely different makeup get pushed into the same "about average." Draw two lines instead — breadth and depth — and at that moment they stand in separate places and can be told apart.

Knowledge ── Not Volume but the Density of the Connective Web

A reviewer "with knowledge" is not someone who has memorized a lot of rules.

Intelligence ── Seeing Through Form to Judge by Substance

Some reviewers know a great deal yet freeze the moment a case does not appear by name in any rule.

Risk Detection ── Reading What Is Not Written

The hardest part of material review is not spotting a rule violation.

Intuition ── The Alarm That Precedes Words

The sixth sense is not a superpower.

Communication ── A Correctness That Doesn't Land Doesn't Exist

A reviewer can hold a perfectly correct finding, yet if that rightness never paints the same picture in the other person's head, the judgment just floats off and vanishes.

Behavior-Change Inducement ── Intrinsic, Even When Unwatched

A comment can be accepted and still change nothing.

Relationship Building ── Neither Enemy Nor Ally, a Trusted Third Party

A material reviewer sits in an awkward spot.

Trust Density ── The Medium That Makes It Work, and the Whole

The same words — "this can't go out" — pass when A says them and bounce when B says them.